linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC] hotplug-memory: refactor online_pages to separate zone growth from page onlining

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 02 Apr 2008 11:59:52 -0700
From:	Dave Hansen <dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
Cc:	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
	Yasunori Goto <y-goto@...fujitsu.com>,
	Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Anthony Liguori <anthony@...emonkey.ws>,
	Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] hotplug-memory: refactor online_pages to separate
	zone growth from page onlining

On Wed, 2008-04-02 at 11:52 -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> > Why don't we just have hotplug work that way?  When we want to take a
> > guest from 1GB to 1GB+1 page (or whatever), we just hotplug the entire
> > section (512MB or 1GB or whatever), actually online the whole thing,
> > then make the balloon driver take it back to where it *should* be.  That
> > way we're completely reusing existing components that have do be able to
> > handle this case anyway.
> >
> > Yeah, this is suboptimal, an it has a possibility of fragmenting the
> > memory, but it will only be used for the x86-32 case.
> >   
> 
> It also requires you actually have the memory on hand to populate the 
> whole area.  512MB is still a significant chunk on a 2GB server; you may 
> end up generating significant overall system memory pressure to scrape 
> together the memory, only to immediately discard it again.

That's a very good point.  Can we make it so that the hypervisors don't
actually allocate the memory to the guest until its first touch?  If the
pages are on the freelist, their *contents* shouldn't be touched at all
during the onlining process.

Maybe we could put a special mark on the pages (please no page flag :)
and the allocator can jump in and ask for the page from the hypervisor
before returning it to the system.  I think Anthony had some ideas
around this area.  It's kinda a poor man's page hinting.

-- Dave

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/