[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <47F3FC2E.7090806@goop.org>
Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2008 14:35:42 -0700
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To: Dave Hansen <dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
CC: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
Yasunori Goto <y-goto@...fujitsu.com>,
Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Anthony Liguori <anthony@...emonkey.ws>,
Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] hotplug-memory: refactor online_pages to separate
zone growth from page onlining
Dave Hansen wrote:
> Oh, once we've let Linux establish ptes to it, we've required that the
> hypervisor have it around? How does that work with the balloon driver?
> Do we destroy the ptes when giving balloon memory back to the
> hypervisor?
>
Yep. It removes any mapping before handing it back to the hypervisor.
> If we're talking about i386, then we're set. We don't map the hot-added
> memory at all because we only add highmem on i386. The only time we map
> these pages is *after* we actually allocate them when they get mapped
> into userspace or used as vmalloc() or they're kmap()'d.
>
Well, the balloon driver can balloon out lowmem pages, so we have to
deal with mappings either way. But balloon+hotplug would work
identically on x86-64, so all pages are mapped.
>> I think we're getting off track here; this is a lot of extra complexity
>> to justify allowing usermode to use /sys to online a chunk of hotplugged
>> memory.
>>
>
> Either that, or we're going to develop the entire Xen/kvm memory hotplug
> architecture around the soon-to-be-legacy i386 limitations. :)
Everything also applies to x86-64.
J
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists