[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0804021536020.32132@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2008 15:41:34 -0700 (PDT)
From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
To: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@...ranet.com>
cc: Hugh Dickins <hugh@...itas.com>, Robin Holt <holt@....com>,
Avi Kivity <avi@...ranet.com>, Izik Eidus <izike@...ranet.com>,
kvm-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
general@...ts.openfabrics.org,
Steve Wise <swise@...ngridcomputing.com>,
Roland Dreier <rdreier@...co.com>,
Kanoj Sarcar <kanojsarcar@...oo.com>, steiner@....com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
daniel.blueman@...drics.com, Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>
Subject: Re: EMM: Require single threadedness for registration.
On Thu, 3 Apr 2008, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> Why can't it fire on the mm_struct where GRU just registered? That
> mm_struct existed way before GRU registered, and VM is free to unmap
> it w/o mmap_sem if there was any memory pressure.
Right. Hmmm... Bad situation. We would have invalidate_start take
a lock to prevent registration until _end has run.
We could use stop_machine_run to register the notifier.... ;-).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists