[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080403064653.GA2410@piper.oerlikon.madduck.net>
Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 08:46:53 +0200
From: martin f krafft <madduck@...duck.net>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Recreating RAID1 after the reckless mdadm usage
also sprach Artem S. Tashkinov <birdie@...monline.ru> [2008.04.03.0746 +0200]:
> mdadm --create --assume-clean --verbose /dev/md0 --level=1 --force
> --raid-devices=2 /dev/sda1 missing (which is obviously the right command).
>
> After doing that I see that my data on a recreated /dev/md0 is there (It
> seems like it's intact). Is it safe to use this RAID1 and is my data
> safe? Can I now add the second block device to md0 using 'mdadm /dev/md0
> -a /dev/sdb1' command?
Looks good. Although you should not use --force or --assume-clean,
you wouldn't have needed them, but they also don't make a difference
in the above command.
--
martin | http://madduck.net/ | http://two.sentenc.es/
the united nations did a poll about food. the only question they asked
was: "could you please give your honest opinion about a solution for
the shortage of food in the rest of the world?" this poll failed
because:
- in africa they didn't know what food was....
- in eastern-europe they didn't know what honest was....
- in western-europe they didn't know what shortage was...
- in china they didn't know what opinion was...
- in the middle-east they didn't know what solution was...
- in south-america they didn't know what please was...
- and in the usa they didn't know what "the rest of the world" was...
spamtraps: madduck.bogus@...duck.net
Download attachment "digital_signature_gpg.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (190 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists