linux-kernel - Re: [rfc] SLQB: YASA

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 3 Apr 2008 10:13:38 +0200
From:	Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>
To:	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
Cc:	Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
Subject: Re: [rfc] SLQB: YASA

On Thu, Apr 03, 2008 at 09:57:25AM +0200, Nick Piggin wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 03, 2008 at 10:45:44AM +0300, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> > Hi Nick,
> > 
> > On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 10:25 AM, Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de> wrote:
> > >  I'm not quite sure what to do with this. If anybody could test or comment,
> > >  I guess that would be a good start :)
> > 
> > Why is this not a patch set against SLUB?
> 
> It's a completely different design of the core allocator algorithms
> really.
> 
> It probably looks quite similar because I started with slub.c, but
> really is just the peripheral supporting code and structure. I'm never
> intending to try to go through the pain of incrementally changing SLUB
> into SLQB. If SLQB is found to be a good idea, then it could maybe get
> merged.

And also I guess I don't think Christoph would be very happy about
it :) He loves higher order allocations :)

The high level choices are pretty clear and I simply think there might
be a better way to do it. I'm not saying it *is* better because I simply
don't know, and there are areas where the tradeoffs I've made means that
in some situations SLQB cannot match SLUB.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/