[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87r6dns53q.fsf@basil.nowhere.org>
Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2008 10:41:13 +0200
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>
Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
Subject: Re: [rfc] SLQB: YASA
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de> writes:
>
> Nothing really interesting, unfortunately. I have run some tests on
> various microbenchmarks like tbench and things like that. But I
> don't have many good ideas for more meaningful tests where slab
> allocation performance is critial. Any suggestions? :)
Some networking workloads hit slab pretty aggressive (two
allocations per packet)
Just be careful with standard loopback, it has a contended lock
elsewhere
-Andi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists