[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6599ad830804031058l1e2a7ad9p56cff47dca738d79@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 10:58:20 -0700
From: "Paul Menage" <menage@...gle.com>
To: "Balbir Singh" <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: "Pavel Emelianov" <xemul@...nvz.org>,
"Hugh Dickins" <hugh@...itas.com>,
"Sudhir Kumar" <skumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"YAMAMOTO Takashi" <yamamoto@...inux.co.jp>, lizf@...fujitsu.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, taka@...inux.co.jp,
linux-mm@...ck.org, "David Rientjes" <rientjes@...gle.com>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki" <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [-mm] Add an owner to the mm_struct (v7)
On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 10:44 AM, Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> +
> + /*
> + * If there are other users of the mm and the owner (us) is exiting
> + * we need to find a new owner to take on the responsibility.
> + * When we use thread groups (CLONE_THREAD), the thread group
> + * leader is kept around in zombie state, even after it exits.
> + * delay_group_leader() ensures that if the group leader is around
> + * we need not select a new owner.
> + */
Hmm, is this new check for delay_group_leader() safe? Won't we have
called exit_cgroup() by this point, and hence be reassigned to the
root cgroup? And so mm->owner->cgroups won't point to the right place?
Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists