[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6599ad830804031156w79366866yed9f8c3b8acf71fb@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 11:56:16 -0700
From: "Paul Menage" <menage@...gle.com>
To: balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: "Dave Hansen" <dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Pavel Emelianov" <xemul@...nvz.org>,
"Hugh Dickins" <hugh@...itas.com>,
"Sudhir Kumar" <skumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"YAMAMOTO Takashi" <yamamoto@...inux.co.jp>, lizf@...fujitsu.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, taka@...inux.co.jp,
linux-mm@...ck.org, "David Rientjes" <rientjes@...gle.com>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki" <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [-mm] Add an owner to the mm_struct (v7)
On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 11:51 AM, Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> >> + * delay_group_leader() ensures that if the group leader is around
> >> + * we need not select a new owner.
> >> + */
> >> + ret = (mm && (atomic_read(&mm->mm_users) > 1) && (mm->owner == p) &&
> >> + !delay_group_leader(p));
> >> + return ret;
> >> +}
> >
> > Ugh. Could you please spell this out a bit more. I find that stuff
> > above really hard to read. Something like:
> >
> > if (!mm)
> > return 0;
> > if (atomic_read(&mm->mm_users) <= 1)
> > return 0;
> > if (mm->owner != p)
> > return 0;
> > if (delay_group_leader(p))
> > return 0;
> > return 1;
> >
>
> The problem with code above is 4 branch instructions and the code I have just 4
> AND operations.
They'll be completely equivalent to the compiler, due to the
short-circuit evaluation of &&
Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists