[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080403161106.fe260fd7.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 16:11:06 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Hiroshi Shimamoto <h-shimamoto@...jp.nec.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl
Subject: Re: [RESEND][RFC v3 PATCH] RTTIME watchdog timer proc interface
On Thu, 03 Apr 2008 15:43:25 -0700
Hiroshi Shimamoto <h-shimamoto@...jp.nec.com> wrote:
> From: Hiroshi Shimamoto <h-shimamoto@...jp.nec.com>
>
> Introduce new proc interface for RTTIME watchdog.
> It makes administrator able to set RTTIME watchdog to exisiting real-time
> applications without impact. It's useful we don't want to change software
> stack, but want to use RTTIME watchdog for that software.
Well you don't really need to change the software stack. It's a matter of
setting RLIMIT_RTTIME in the parent process before starting the stack up.
This is not much more work than poking at /proc/<pid>/rttime afterwards.
Although setting RLIMIT_RTTIME via fork() is much less useful than being
able to alter it at runtime.
> fs/proc/base.c | 103 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
And that's rather a lot of new code just for RLIMIT_RTTIME. And
RLIMIT_RTTIME is not the only rlimit which has this problem - generally the
rlimit interface is a rather nasty one.
I think we should look at creating a general way of modifying and reading a
running process's rlimits. If we want to do that, a syscall would be the
appropriate interface.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists