[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080402192633.722bec28.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2008 19:26:33 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Erez Zadok <ezk@...sunysb.edu>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, hch@...radead.org
Subject: Re: fs_stack/eCryptfs: remove 3rd arg of copy_attr_all, add locking
to copy_inode_size
On Wed, 2 Apr 2008 21:49:11 -0400 Erez Zadok <ezk@...sunysb.edu> wrote:
> Andrew, this patch has been in my git tree for a while. It affects current
> mainline users (i.e., ecryptfs). Do you think it can go to mainline soon?
> If not, post-25? (I can remind you then). This patch has a few changes, and
> I can break it into several smaller ones if desired:
>
> 1. remove the 3rd arg to fsstack_copy_attr_all. There are no users for it:
> ecryptfs never used the 3rd arg; unionfs stopped using it a long time
> ago. Halcrow ok'ed this patch some time ago.
>
> 2. add necessary locking for 32-bit smp systems in fsstack_copy_inode_size
> (courtesy Hugh Dickins).
>
> 3. minor commenting style changes, and addition of copyrights which were
> missing.
>
> Thanks,
> Erez.
>
> --cut--here----cut--here----cut--here----cut--here----cut--here--
>
>
> fs_stack/eCryptfs: remove 3rd arg of copy_attr_all, add locking to copy_inode_size
I'm already carrying this, via git-unionfs. It makes it a bit hard to merge.
I guess resending it during the 2.6.26 merge window would suit.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists