[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <47F42259.8030603@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2008 09:18:33 +0900
From: Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com>
To: Justin Mattock <justinmattock@...il.com>
CC: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Alan <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>, Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Subject: Re: suspend
Hello,
Justin Mattock wrote:
>> > [ 1233.811794] sd 2:0:1:0: [sda] Starting disk
>> > [ 1234.013599] ata1.00: ACPI cmd ef/03:0c:00:00:00:a0 filtered out
>> > [ 1234.013601] ata1.00: ACPI cmd ef/03:44:00:00:00:a0 filtered out
>> > [ 1234.180232] ata1.00: configured for UDMA/66
>> > [ 1222.732011] ata3.01: NODEV after polling detection
>> > [ 1222.732016] ata3.01: revalidation failed (errno=-2)
I presume this is ata_piix, right? What's hanging off of ata3.01? An
optical drive?
What happened is that, after resuming, libata reseted the channel and
issued IDENTIFY[_PACKET] to make sure the device was still there. The
device violated the state machine transition in the same way as when
there's no device attached. libata paused for a while and retries and
the device responded correctly at the retry. Things like this can
happen. The problem is that libata resume is currently synchronous and
retries like this hold the machine back from reaching operational status
even when there's no reason for resume retrial on optical drive to delay
the rest of resume process.
Can you please post full kernel log and the result of 'lspci -nn'?
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists