[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <47F46436.3060607@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2008 12:59:34 +0800
From: Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>
To: Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm 2/3] cgroup: simplify init_subsys()
Paul Menage wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 7:16 PM, Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com> wrote:
>> -
>> - /* If this subsystem requested that it be notified with fork
>> - * events, we should send it one now for every process in the
>> - * system */
>> - if (ss->fork) {
>> - struct task_struct *g, *p;
>> -
>> - read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
>> - do_each_thread(g, p) {
>> - ss->fork(ss, p);
>> - } while_each_thread(g, p);
>> - read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
>> - }
>
> Should we maybe call ss->fork(ss, &init_task) ? Or just document that
> ss->fork() explicitly doesn't get called for init.
>
> Maybe also add some BUG()s to confirm that no other tasks have in fact
> been forked by this point?
>
At system boot, before all the subsystems have been registered, no processes
including init has been forked, am I right? So the fork callback will be
invoked when the init process is forked, so we don't need to call
ss->fork(ss, &init_task).
I'll add a BUG_ON(), and update the document about the fork callback.
Regards,
Li Zefan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists