lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 03 Apr 2008 22:35:43 -0700
From:	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To:	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
CC:	Dave Hansen <dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Yasunori Goto <y-goto@...fujitsu.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5 of 6] hotplug-memory: add section_ops

KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> On Thu, 03 Apr 2008 17:51:12 -0700
> Dave Hansen <dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>
>   
>> On Thu, 2008-04-03 at 17:05 -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
>>     
>>> Add a per-section "section_ops" structure,  allowing each section to have
>>> specific functions for onlining and offlining pages within the section.
>>> This is used by the Xen balloon driver to make sure that pages are not
>>> onlined without some physical memory backing them.
>>>       
>> This is kinda a lot of code and mucking around for what we actually get
>> out of it, especially since you just condensed down all the actual
>> online_page() instances.
>>
>> I think it might just be nicer to have a global list of these handlers
>> somewhere.  The Xen driver can just say "put me on the list of
>> callbacks" and we'll call them at online_page().  I really don't think
>> we need to be passing an ops structure around.
>>
>> KAME, did you have some other ideas about this?
>>
>>     
>
> At first. please don't call online_page() handler in add_memory() phase.
> online_page() handler should be called in online_pages().
>   

Yes, that's how it is at the moment.

> Passing handler to online_pages() is much easier and it's ok to me.
>   

Rather than an ops structure associated with the section?  That's a 
possibility...  I'll see how that looks...

    J
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists