[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <47F7A190.9070401@qumranet.com>
Date: Sat, 05 Apr 2008 18:58:08 +0300
From: Avi Kivity <avi@...ranet.com>
To: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
CC: Pekka Paalanen <pq@....fi>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Pavel Roskin <proski@....org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
vegard.nossum@...il.com
Subject: Re: mmiotrace bug: recursive probe hit
Avi Kivity wrote:
>>
>> For kmemcheck, I'd prefer the per-CPU page tables suggested by Ingo.
>> I'm having hard time understanding why that's a "ugly hack" compared
>> to using kvm for this...
>>
>
> It's not an ugly hack, but will be very very difficult. With mmu
> notifiers it's probably doable though:
>
> - the linux page tables are never loaded into cr3, but rather kept as
> a reference
> - page faults are by instantiating ptes into shadow page tables (which
> track the linux page tables)
> - mmu notifiers are used to drop shadow ptes when the linux ptes change
>
Actually, paravirt_ops is a much better match, as it also provides hooks
for setting cr3. I think you can implement per-cpu pagetables using
paravirt_ops without modifying core mm code at all.
--
Do not meddle in the internals of kernels, for they are subtle and quick to panic.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists