[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6599ad830804051629k3649dbc4na92bb3d0cd7a0492@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2008 16:29:35 -0700
From: "Paul Menage" <menage@...gle.com>
To: balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: "Pavel Emelianov" <xemul@...nvz.org>,
"Hugh Dickins" <hugh@...itas.com>,
"Sudhir Kumar" <skumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"YAMAMOTO Takashi" <yamamoto@...inux.co.jp>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, taka@...inux.co.jp,
linux-mm@...ck.org, "David Rientjes" <rientjes@...gle.com>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki" <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [-mm] Add an owner to the mm_struct (v8)
On Sat, Apr 5, 2008 at 11:59 AM, Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> > But surely the performance of thread exits wouldn't be affected by the
> > delay_group_leader(p) change, since none of the exiting threads would
> > be a group leader. That optimization only matters when the entire
> > process exits.
> >
>
> On the client side, each JVM instance exits after the test. I see the thread
> group leader exit as well through getdelays (I see TGID exits).
How long does the test run for? How many threads does each client have?
Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists