[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200804041941.35075.david-b@pacbell.net>
Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 19:41:34 -0700
From: David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: "Kyungmin Park" <kmpark@...radead.org>,
"Josh Boyer" <jwboyer@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
"Michael Trimarchi" <trimarchimichael@...oo.it>,
spi-devel-general@...ts.sourceforge.net, dwmw2@...radead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.arm.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH] jffs2 summary allocation
On Friday 04 April 2008, Andrew Morton wrote:
> This problem comes up pretty often.
Which problem -- kmalloc(BIG)? Or dma(dma-unsafe-mem)?
Or something else?
The specific issue here might best be described as JFFS2
making a bad assumption: that MTD drivers never use DMA.
The I2C stack does that in some cases (for example, I/O
buffers in i2c_smbus_xfer_emulated are on-stack), but I'd
not call that an especially common assumption.
> Rather than open-coding it yet again
> it'd be nice to have a little bit of library code which manages an array of
> pages and which has accessors for common operations like
> read/write-u8/u16/u32/u64, memset, memcpy, etc.
If array-of-pages is to be more widely adopted, that'd
make sense. The MTD framework is a bit odd in that
respect ... it has block devices but doesn't use the
scatterlist primitives.
- Dave
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists