[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <47F861C8.7080700@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Sun, 06 Apr 2008 11:08:16 +0530
From: Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>
CC: Pavel Emelianov <xemul@...nvz.org>,
Hugh Dickins <hugh@...itas.com>,
Sudhir Kumar <skumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
YAMAMOTO Takashi <yamamoto@...inux.co.jp>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, taka@...inux.co.jp,
linux-mm@...ck.org, David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [-mm] Add an owner to the mm_struct (v8)
Paul Menage wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 5, 2008 at 11:59 AM, Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>> > But surely the performance of thread exits wouldn't be affected by the
>> > delay_group_leader(p) change, since none of the exiting threads would
>> > be a group leader. That optimization only matters when the entire
>> > process exits.
>> >
>>
>> On the client side, each JVM instance exits after the test. I see the thread
>> group leader exit as well through getdelays (I see TGID exits).
>
> How long does the test run for? How many threads does each client have?
The test on each client side runs for about 10 seconds. I saw the client create
up to 411 threads.
--
Warm Regards,
Balbir Singh
Linux Technology Center
IBM, ISTL
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists