[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <47F920E4.9050808@tungstengraphics.com>
Date: Sun, 06 Apr 2008 21:13:40 +0200
From: Thomas Hellström <thomas@...gstengraphics.com>
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
CC: Linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Use kernel_map_pages() to avoid illegal page aliasing.
Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> Thomas Hellström wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> For a long time now, the agpgart module has been creating illegal
>> mapping aliases, since the user-space mappings of the pages in the
>> gart are usually write-combined, whereas the kernel linear mapping of
>> the same pages are uc for x86, and may even be wb for some
>> architectures.
>>
>> In order to fix this, and to facilitate fast insertion and removal of
>> pages into / from the gart I'd like to disable all default kernel
>> mappings for those pages, which would in effect, make them behave as
>> highmem pages from our point of view.
>>
>> As prevously discussed, the x86 set_memory_xxx() interface wasn't
>> suitable for this, since it handles only a single mapping, and the
>> pages may have more than one default kernel mapping.
>>
>> But it turns out that there is an interface that does exactly this.
>> kernel_map_pages(). But it is only available with
>> CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC. I'd like to make that function exported by
>> default, but with some minor alterations as the original functions
>> does some debug checks as well, that aren't desirable for the purpose
>> mentioned above:
>>
>> As with highmem pages, if the driver sets up user-space mappings with
>> non-standard caching attributes, those mappings need to be killed at
>> suspend time, since the suspend code would otherwise create temporary
>> incompatible mappings.
>>
>> On x86 this all would probably work fine. Does kernel_map_pages()
>> work identically on other architectures? Specifically: Will it always
>> work with a 4K page granularity?
>
> Well, not all architectures use 4k as their base page size, but
> kernel_map_pages should work at the smallest supported page size.
>
> The disadvantage of this is that it will end up shattering any
> large-page mappings the kernel has. This is pretty much unavoidable
> unless you can arrange to only allocate AGP pages in a physically
> distinct area away from other kernel allocations (a mechanism to do
> this might be generally useful, though I'm not sure what form it would
> take - another zone perhaps?).
>
> J
Thanks for the info. Yes, we've had to live with the splitting of large
pages for some time. In the future we'll probably set up a pool of video
pages into which we might perhaps try to allocate highmem pages or try
allocations with large page sizes. In the end perhaps another zone will
be needed.
/Thomas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists