[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <47FA6BE1.6090306@sgi.com>
Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2008 11:45:53 -0700
From: Mike Travis <travis@....com>
To: Bert Wesarg <bert.wesarg@...glemail.com>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] x86: modify show_shared_cpu_map in intel_cacheinfo
v2
Bert Wesarg wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 5, 2008 at 3:24 AM, Mike Travis <travis@....com> wrote:
>> --- linux-2.6.x86.orig/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_cacheinfo.c
>> +++ linux-2.6.x86/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_cacheinfo.c
>> @@ -593,14 +593,17 @@ static ssize_t show_size(struct _cpuid4_
>>
>> static ssize_t show_shared_cpu_map(struct _cpuid4_info *this_leaf, char *buf)
>> {
>> + unsigned long end = ALIGN((unsigned long)buf, PAGE_SIZE);
> May I suggest this:
>
> ptrdiff_t len = PTR_ALIGN(buf + PAGE_SIZE - 1, PAGE_SIZE) - buf;
Hmm, that sounds great. There were a number of different methods used in
the various places to provide for that extra '\n'! ;-)
>
>> + if (len == 0)
>> + len = PAGE_SIZE;
> Than this is not necessary.
>
>> +
>> + if (len >= 2) {
>> + n = cpus_scnprintf(buf, len-2, this_leaf->shared_cpu_map);
>> + buf[n++] = '\n';
>> + buf[n] = '\0';
>> }
>> return n;
>> }
> Apart from my suggestion and the use of cpus_scnprintf I think this patch is ok.
>
> Bert
>
> PS: sorry for the long delay.
Thanks!
Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists