[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <47FA94AE.4070803@cs.helsinki.fi>
Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2008 00:39:58 +0300
From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: Hugh Dickins <hugh@...itas.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>,
Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: fix sense_slab/bio swapping livelock
Linus Torvalds wrote:
>> I suspect the right thing to do is not to mark them for "IO", but mark
>> them for "short-lived", and allow short-lived allocations that don't
>> have extended lifetimes to succeed even when a "real" allocation
>> wouldn't.
Pekka Enberg wrote:
> Yeah, makes sense. We do have GFP_TEMPORARY so we could associate this
> new semantics with that. But the real problem here is how to do the
> "allocate harder" part which, btw, sounds very similar to what Peter's
> kmalloc reserve patches try to do...
Actually, a trivial way to implement that is to have a few "emergency
kmalloc" caches say for sizes 64, 128, 256, and 512 that have some
pre-allocated pages into which these GFP_TEMPORARY allocations are
allowed to dip into on OOM and OOM only.
Pekka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists