[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <84144f020804070317j4af69036q9801c288ba9ecac4@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2008 13:17:54 +0300
From: "Pekka Enberg" <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
To: "Boaz Harrosh" <bharrosh@...asas.com>
Cc: "Hugh Dickins" <hugh@...itas.com>,
"James Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"FUJITA Tomonori" <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>,
"Jens Axboe" <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
"Christoph Lameter" <clameter@....com>,
"Peter Zijlstra" <a.p.ziljstra@...llo.nl>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, mpm@...enic.com,
linux-scsi <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: scsi: fix sense_slab/bio swapping livelock
Hi Boaz,
On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 1:07 PM, Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@...asas.com> wrote:
> Please forgive my ignorance, but what is then the difference between kmem_cache_alloc()
> and kmalloc?
Constructors, user-defined alignment, and tighter object packing.
On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 1:07 PM, Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@...asas.com> wrote:
> would you not agree that sometimes we want to override that sharing of SLOBs?
To be honest, I really don't quite understand your use-case. But as
far as I can tell, it hasn't never been explicitly guaranteed and most
certainly has not been true since the merging of SLOB and more
recently SLUB.
Pekka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists