linux-kernel - proto_register() - Justification for requesting slab allocation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <722741.62734.qm@web37601.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Date:	Tue, 8 Apr 2008 05:36:12 -0700 (PDT)
From:	Eus <eus@...ber.fsf.org>
To:	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: proto_register() - Justification for requesting slab allocation

Hi Ho!

Currently I am trying to implement a new type of socket in Linux kernel 2.6.21.5.
I am really curious about this function:
        int proto_register(struct proto *prot, int alloc_slab)

I have investigated the source code and knew that, if alloc_slab is set to a
non-zero integer, kmem_cache_create() will create a memory slab for prot->slab.
At the end, when a socket needs to be created and sk_alloc() is invoked to create
the socket object, if prot->slab has been initialized with kmem_cache_create(),
sk_alloc() will simply create the socket object in the slab with
kmem_cache_alloc. Otherwise, sk_alloc() will create the socket object in the
ordinary way with kmalloc().

IMO, kmem_cache_alloc() should be less expensive than kmalloc() and, therefore,
it is a good thing to request slab allocation when invoking proto_register().
But, from all networking protocols that invoke proto_register(), 50% of them,
most of them are data link protocols, does not request slab allocation. The rest
that request slab allocation mainly is network layer protocols. That is why I
wonder whether or not there is an advantage of using kmalloc() over using
kmem_cache_alloc().

A friend of mine said that those that do not request slab allocation do so
because they are rarely used. But, I disagree because, although they are rarely
used, once they are used, they are used heavily, for example AF_PACKET, so that
it is a good idea to request slab allocation.

Therefore, what is the justification for requesting slab allocation or not?

Thank you very much.

Best regards,
Eus

      ____________________________________________________________________________________
You rock. That's why Blockbuster's offering you one month of Blockbuster Total Access, No Cost.  
http://tc.deals.yahoo.com/tc/blockbuster/text5.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/