[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080408135203.GB670@logfs.org>
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 15:52:04 +0200
From: Jörn Engel <joern@...fs.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [patch 1/15] Makefiles and Kconfig
On Tue, 8 April 2008 15:41:59 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 08 April 2008, Jörn Engel wrote:
> > "Logfs file system" might make sense. LOGFS_FS is something I would
> > rather avoid. For some reason my brain reacts strongly to repetition,
> > redundancy and superfluous information.
> >
>
> How about LOG_FS then? I don't think there is a really good argument
> either way, but a large majority uses the *_FS notation in Kconfig.
Fair enough.
Jörn
--
Write programs that do one thing and do it well. Write programs to work
together. Write programs to handle text streams, because that is a
universal interface.
-- Doug MacIlroy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists