lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1207605856.12481.35.camel@johannes.berg>
Date:	Tue, 08 Apr 2008 00:04:16 +0200
From:	Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
To:	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:	Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-sparse <linux-sparse@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Using sparse to catch invalid RCU dereferences?

Hi,

Just a thought, I haven't tried this yet because I'm not entirely sure
it's actually correct. I was just thinking it should be possible to
introduce something like

	#define __rcu	__attribute__((address_space(3)))

(for sparse only, of course) and then be able to say

	struct myfoo *foo __rcu;

and sparse would warn on

	struct myfoo *bar = foo;

but not on

	struct myfoo *bar = rcu_dereference(foo);

by way of using __force inside rcu_dereference(), rcu_assign_pointer()
etc.

Would this be feasible? Or should one actually use __bitwise/__force to
also get the warning when assigning between two variables both marked
__rcu?

johannes

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (829 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ