[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <36ca99e90804081240q31516fbegadbcc98360813863@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 21:40:05 +0200
From: "Bert Wesarg" <bert.wesarg@...glemail.com>
To: "Mike Travis" <travis@....com>
Cc: "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...e.hu>, "Paul Jackson" <pj@....com>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] cpumask: use new cpus_scnprintf function v3
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 8:43 PM, Mike Travis <travis@....com> wrote:
> --- linux-2.6.x86.sched.orig/drivers/base/node.c
> +++ linux-2.6.x86.sched/drivers/base/node.c
> @@ -19,22 +19,34 @@ static struct sysdev_class node_class =
> };
>
>
> -static ssize_t node_read_cpumap(struct sys_device * dev, char * buf)
> +static ssize_t node_read_cpumap(struct sys_device *dev, int type, char *buf)
> {
> struct node *node_dev = to_node(dev);
> node_to_cpumask_ptr(mask, node_dev->sysdev.id);
> int len;
>
> - /* 2004/06/03: buf currently PAGE_SIZE, need > 1 char per 4 bits. */
> - BUILD_BUG_ON(MAX_NUMNODES/4 > PAGE_SIZE/2);
> + /* 2008/04/07: buf currently PAGE_SIZE, need 9 chars per 32 bits. */
> + BUILD_BUG_ON((NR_CPUS/32 * 9) > (PAGE_SIZE-1));
Is this right, that you switch from MAX_NUMNODES to NR_CPUS?
Regards
Bert
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists