[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <47FBD99A.2080007@sgi.com>
Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2008 13:46:18 -0700
From: Mike Travis <travis@....com>
To: Bert Wesarg <bert.wesarg@...glemail.com>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Paul Jackson <pj@....com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] cpumask: use new cpus_scnprintf function v3
Bert Wesarg wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 8:43 PM, Mike Travis <travis@....com> wrote:
>> --- linux-2.6.x86.sched.orig/drivers/base/node.c
>> +++ linux-2.6.x86.sched/drivers/base/node.c
>> @@ -19,22 +19,34 @@ static struct sysdev_class node_class =
>> };
>>
>>
>> -static ssize_t node_read_cpumap(struct sys_device * dev, char * buf)
>> +static ssize_t node_read_cpumap(struct sys_device *dev, int type, char *buf)
>> {
>> struct node *node_dev = to_node(dev);
>> node_to_cpumask_ptr(mask, node_dev->sysdev.id);
>> int len;
>>
>> - /* 2004/06/03: buf currently PAGE_SIZE, need > 1 char per 4 bits. */
>> - BUILD_BUG_ON(MAX_NUMNODES/4 > PAGE_SIZE/2);
>> + /* 2008/04/07: buf currently PAGE_SIZE, need 9 chars per 32 bits. */
>> + BUILD_BUG_ON((NR_CPUS/32 * 9) > (PAGE_SIZE-1));
> Is this right, that you switch from MAX_NUMNODES to NR_CPUS?
>
> Regards
> Bert
It's printing the number of cpus on a node, so the number of nodes is not
important, it's how many cpus can fit on the head of a node... ;-)
Thanks,
Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists