[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6599ad830804072337g2e7b4613hdcc05062dc2ca4e0@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2008 23:37:43 -0700
From: "Paul Menage" <menage@...gle.com>
To: balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: "Pavel Emelianov" <xemul@...nvz.org>,
"Hugh Dickins" <hugh@...itas.com>,
"Sudhir Kumar" <skumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"YAMAMOTO Takashi" <yamamoto@...inux.co.jp>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, taka@...inux.co.jp,
linux-mm@...ck.org, "David Rientjes" <rientjes@...gle.com>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki" <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [-mm] Add an owner to the mm_struct (v8)
On Sat, Apr 5, 2008 at 10:38 PM, Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> >
> > How long does the test run for? How many threads does each client have?
>
> The test on each client side runs for about 10 seconds. I saw the client create
> up to 411 threads.
>
I'm not convinced that an application that creates 400 threads and
exits in 10 seconds is particular representative of a high-performance
application.
But I agree that it's an example of something it may be worth trying
to optimize for.
You mention that you saw tgid exits - what order did the individual
threads exit in? If we threw the mm to the last thread in the thread
group rather than the first, would that help?
Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists