[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080409150333.GA24451@elte.hu>
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 17:03:33 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Jacek Luczak <difrost.kernel@...il.com>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for April 9
* Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com> wrote:
> | > It seems that commit 883a9fc4e5d9b0701f15d4e5a23608f942104721
> | > ("x86: cleanup - rename VM_MASK to X86_VM_MASK") from the x86 tree
> | > seems to have missed some places.
> |
> | i think what happened is that some changes came in from other trees
> | that reintroduced the old symbols?
>
> actually, that is the only explanation I could find. The last time I
> sent you patches to fixup *all* VM_MASK (wich were grep'ed on *latest
> branch over *all* sources inside x86). So this all were settled down
> by a few of my patches and /for shame on me/ yours fixups. So these
> fixups were missed on merging.
no, the problem turned out to be that i kept those fixes too spread out,
and part of them went into the x86/for-akpm portion of the tree, part of
it went into x86/testing. Since all x86 developers work against
x86/testing this was never a problem - only now did it become one when i
shuffled patches and branch boundaries around. Such problems will go
away once linux-next starts using x86/testing as well. In any case i
moved your fixes together and fixed up the patch ordering as well.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists