linux-kernel - Re: [patch] checkpatch: relax spacing and line length

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20080409081412.5d2a5596.rdunlap@xenotime.net>
Date:	Wed, 9 Apr 2008 08:14:12 -0700
From:	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>
To:	Andy Whitcroft <apw@...dowen.org>
Cc:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...putergmbh.de>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch] checkpatch: relax spacing and line length

On Wed, 9 Apr 2008 14:14:20 +0100 Andy Whitcroft wrote:

> === 8< ===
> add a note on the risks associated with wide ranging style cleanups
> 
> Add a NOTE to the SubmittingPatches guide pointing out the issues which
> may occur when submitting wide ranging style cleanups, and pointing the
> reader to the area maintainers.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andy Whitcroft <apw@...dowen.org>
> ---
>  Documentation/SubmittingPatches |    6 ++++++
>  1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> diff --git a/Documentation/SubmittingPatches b/Documentation/SubmittingPatches
> index 08a1ed1..633b9cf 100644
> --- a/Documentation/SubmittingPatches
> +++ b/Documentation/SubmittingPatches
> @@ -472,6 +472,12 @@ The checker reports at three levels:
>  You should be able to justify all violations that remain in your
>  patch.
>  
> +NOTE: updating entire files purely for style violations can cause
> +significant issues for other contributers and maintainers by increasing

                                contributors

> +collisions between patches.  It is therefore recommended you contact the
> +area Maintainer to ensure these patches are likely to be accepted _before_
> +starting work.
> +
>  
>  
>  2) #ifdefs are ugly



---
~Randy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/