lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <36ca99e90804090853xf62438ayfbfa6010f2d31747@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 9 Apr 2008 17:53:38 +0200
From:	"Bert Wesarg" <bert.wesarg@...glemail.com>
To:	"Mike Travis" <travis@....com>
Cc:	"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...e.hu>, "Paul Jackson" <pj@....com>,
	"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] cpumask: use new cpus_scnprintf function v3

On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 10:46 PM, Mike Travis <travis@....com> wrote:
>
> Bert Wesarg wrote:
>  > On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 8:43 PM, Mike Travis <travis@....com> wrote:
>  >>  --- linux-2.6.x86.sched.orig/drivers/base/node.c
>  >>  +++ linux-2.6.x86.sched/drivers/base/node.c
>  >>  @@ -19,22 +19,34 @@ static struct sysdev_class node_class =
>  >>   };
>  >>
>  >>
>  >>  -static ssize_t node_read_cpumap(struct sys_device * dev, char * buf)
>  >>  +static ssize_t node_read_cpumap(struct sys_device *dev, int type, char *buf)
>  >>   {
>  >>         struct node *node_dev = to_node(dev);
>  >>         node_to_cpumask_ptr(mask, node_dev->sysdev.id);
>  >>         int len;
>  >>
>  >>  -       /* 2004/06/03: buf currently PAGE_SIZE, need > 1 char per 4 bits. */
>  >>  -       BUILD_BUG_ON(MAX_NUMNODES/4 > PAGE_SIZE/2);
>  >>  +       /* 2008/04/07: buf currently PAGE_SIZE, need 9 chars per 32 bits. */
>  >>  +       BUILD_BUG_ON((NR_CPUS/32 * 9) > (PAGE_SIZE-1));
>  > Is this right, that you switch from MAX_NUMNODES to NR_CPUS?
>  >
>  > Regards
>  > Bert
>
>  It's printing the number of cpus on a node, so the number of nodes is not
>  important, it's how many cpus can fit on the head of a node... ;-)
Ahh, the old code was Just Plain Wrong.

Thanks.
Bert
>
>  Thanks,
>  Mike
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ