[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <47FCF9DD.6080007@rtr.ca>
Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2008 13:16:13 -0400
From: Mark Lord <lkml@....ca>
To: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Network <linux-net@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.25-rc8: FTP transfer errors
Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Mark Lord wrote:
>> Mark Lord wrote:
>>> Today I've been using 2.6.25-rc8 with an old embedded build system here
>>> for my empegs. One shell script calls out to /usr/bin/ftp to transfer
>>> an image to a remote system, and then read it back again and compare.
>>>
>>> The compare is failing, most (but not all) of the time,
>>> but only on 2.6.25-rc8, not on 2.6.24. Verified by switching
>>> back and forth between kernel versions for a short spell.
>>>
>>> The ftp client is netkit-ftp 0.17-16 on Kubuntu feisty.
>>>
>>> Switching to ncftpput/ncftpget avoids it on 2.6.25,
>>> but I wonder where the problem is.
>> ..
>>
>> Now verified that the data loss occurs in the outbound direction.
>> The readback data is the same, regardless of which client s/w is used.
>>
>> So something in 2.6.25 is incompatible with the ftp client binary, or
>> libs, that are installed here. Or some other problem.
>
> Or maybe it uses sendfile, and that is broken?
..
No, it uses read()/write() calls (from the strace).
Here's the most recent update:
> Recap, with more info:
>
> The host system is running 2.6.25-rc8-git. It uses netkit-ftp to
> send a file to the remote system. Using strace shows that the
> entire file was read, and passed to write() for the outbound socket.
>
> The remote system is running linux-2.2.xx, and is reporting -EPIPE
> from net/socket.c::sock_recvmsg() before all of the data has been received,
> and thus ends up with a short file, missing data at the end.
>
> This exact sequence, with the exact same software,
> works fine when the host system is NOT running 2.6.25-*,
> (eg. 2.6.11 through 2.6.24 are fine).
>
> Something may be broken here.
..
The failing FTP client software issues a close() on the socket after
the final data write(). This close seems to be propagated to the other
end before the data is fully received.
I suppose a wireshark capture is next, once I dig out my ancient hub
so we can sniff it from an independent box.
-ml
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists