[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <47FC5B7C.3020504@sgi.com>
Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2008 23:00:28 -0700
From: Mike Travis <travis@....com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>,
Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
Subject: Re: bootmem allocator
Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org> wrote:
>
>>> hm, bootmem allocator is supposed to clear memory. We have a couple
>>> of places that rely on that.
>> I was actually considering to change that for the GB pages hugetlbfs
>> patchkit, because memset for 1G is a little slow and not needed (will
>> be cleared later anyways) and it might be a problem for very large
>> systems with a lot of such pages at boot.
>
> changing the default behavior of bootmem alloc to be non-clearing is a
> really bad idea that will only cause unrobustness. The proper approach
> is to add an _opt-in_ API that does not clear memory
> (bootmem_alloc_dontclear() or whatever), available to callers that know
> it for sure that they dont need the clearing.
Yes, changing the default of bootmem_alloc is a bad idea. I just changed
a bunch of static arrays to bootmem alloc's and it was pointed out early
that not only does bootmem_alloc clear memory, but also panics if it's not
available.
> Also take into account that alloc_bootmem_low() :
> - calls panic() if not enough memory
> - already clears allocated memory
> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
A specialized call to bootmem_alloc probably needs it's own API... ;-)
Thanks,
Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists