linux-kernel - Re: gpio patches in mmotm

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0804092133160.7315@axis700.grange>
Date:	Wed, 9 Apr 2008 21:35:04 +0200 (CEST)
From:	Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@...gutronix.de>
To:	Uwe Kleine-König <Uwe.Kleine-Koenig@...i.com>
cc:	David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: gpio patches in mmotm

On Wed, 9 Apr 2008, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:

> Hello Guennadi,
> 
> Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> >                      My original proposal was to introduce just one 
> > NO_GPIO macro to test against, however, David nicely managed to persuade 
> > me, that the gpio_is_valid approach is better. Unfortunately, I cannot 
> > argument as nicely as he did, maybe looking through his emails in LKML 
> > archives will help you:-)
> I'm unable to find these mails.  (Using gmane, looking for mails by
> David matching gpio_is_valid, the oldest post I can find is
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/637654.)
> 
> Can you please point out the discussion in the archives?

See also

http://marc.info/?t=120179335100005&r=1&w=2
http://marc.info/?t=120267097400002&r=1&w=2

Thanks
Guennadi
---
Guennadi Liakhovetski
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/