[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <47FD1DF6.2000007@garzik.org>
Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2008 15:50:14 -0400
From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>,
"Kok, Auke" <auke-jan.h.kok@...el.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
NetDev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
e1000-list <e1000-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
linux-pci maillist <linux-pci@...ey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>,
"Ronciak, John" <john.ronciak@...el.com>,
"Allan, Bruce W" <bruce.w.allan@...el.com>,
Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Subject: Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix
Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org> wrote:
>
>>> We've got three thousand Kconfig options - it is clearly not
>>> realistic for users to keep such details in mind to avoid pitfalls.
>> Agreed -- hence the multiple announcements, including in this thread,
>> to put said details into mind.
>
> which part of "it took a kernel developer more than an hour to figure
> out why his laptop had a dead network interface" did you not understand?
> Whatever you did, it was not apparent to me. I dont follow every tiny
> detail of the e1000 driver family, nor do 99%+ [*] of our users.
You do follow LKML, where multiple announcements have and are being posted.
Jeff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists