[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080409203909.GA17183@suse.de>
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 13:39:09 -0700
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To: Bert Wesarg <bert.wesarg@...glemail.com>
Cc: Mike Travis <travis@....com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Paul Jackson <pj@....com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] x86: add cpus_scnprintf function v3
On Wed, Apr 09, 2008 at 07:51:23PM +0200, Bert Wesarg wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 8:43 PM, Mike Travis <travis@....com> wrote:
> > * Cleanup usages of cpumask_scprintf in the following files and add
> > another interface to use cpulist_scnprintf where appropriate.
>
> On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 8:22 PM, Mike Travis <travis@....com> wrote:
> > Part of the change is readability, but also looking towards the future
> > of 16k/64k/??? # of cpus, the straight mask approach will overflow the
> > PAGE_SIZE buffer provided (though some pathological cases will overflow
> > the range method as well.) So we'll need some advancement in the format
> > of the printout.
>
> Btw, I think you can now push for a deprecation of the 'old' mask
> attributes, with the justification you have given above. The other
> possibility is to change sysfs to provide bigger attribute buffers
> (CCed Greg for this).
Huh?
sysfs is "one value per file", if you are getting close to PAGE_SIZE in
any sysfs file, then you are doing something very wrong.
What sysfs file currently is trying to output data this big?
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists