lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5be025980804082359i125deasfd2e34a3c51f8524@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 9 Apr 2008 02:59:18 -0400
From:	"Wei Hu" <glegoo@...il.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: On what archs are PROT_READ and PROT_EXEC independent?

Hello,

I know that newer Intel and AMD CPUs support readable and
non-executable pages. But from my tests, if I use mprotect() to set a
page's permission to be PROT_EXEC, that page is still readable. I'm
wondering what architectures implement these flags independently? Is
it possible to get executable and non-readable pages?

Thanks,
Wei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ