[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <kjmk5j7xrij.fsf@pelargir.dolphinics.no>
Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2008 12:16:20 +0200
From: Arne Georg Gleditsch <arne.gleditsch@...phinics.no>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc: Zhao Forrest <forrest.zhao@...il.com>, discuss@...-64.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, yhlu.kernel@...il.com, mingo@...e.hu
Subject: Re: Does Linux have plan to support memory hole remapping?
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org> writes:
> On Wed, Apr 09, 2008 at 11:50:00AM +0200, Arne Georg Gleditsch wrote:
>> Hm, wouldn't the given e820 map and mtrr listing indicate that 512M were
>> actually remapped to 32G+ in this case?
>
> The way it usually works (if it is implemented correctly in the BIOS)
> is that all memory starting at the hole moves up together
> (often subject to DIMM boundaries etc.),
> not that the area below the hole is remapped individually.
Yes, bad choice of words on my part.
> BTW it is not actually 512MB that is lost. MemTotal does not
> include mem_map and that alone is ~512MB (64 bytes for each 4K page)
>
> So as far as I can see there is no missing memory remapping in Zhao's case,
> he's just confused by the MemTotal semantics.
...meaning that upgrading his BIOS isn't going to change anything for
him, which is what I suspected from the e820 readouts.
--
Arne.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists