[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080410094853.GA12543@elte.hu>
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 11:48:53 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for April 9
* Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Apr 2008 08:52:27 +0200 Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
> >
> > what type of conflict do you have there? If it's a new entry then
> > you might be able to fix it by moving the new entry elsewhere in the
> > file. Or if i introduced a new entry close to an existing entry you
> > modify then i could move my new entry elsewhere.
>
> Commit 523a65f1a7a339e528ca6d6d808516fe195fde03 ("firewire: fw-ohci:
> add option for remote debugging") in the ieee1394 tree adds a new
> entry just where the sched tree adds
>
> source kernel/trace/Kconfig
hm, i think in this specific case the new firewire entry should be added
after the PROVIDE_OHCI1394_DMA_INIT section. (that's how we extend
groups of Kconfig entries anyway) The new trace entries in the scheduler
tree follow that pattern and add the new kernel/trace/Kconfig at the
right place. So if the firewire entry is added that way this conflict
could be avoided.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists