[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080410101408.GA12853@elte.hu>
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 12:14:11 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc: astarikovskiy@...e.de, len.brown@...el.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: mpparse merge
(Cc:-ing lkml because obviously others are interested in this topic too)
* Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org> wrote:
> Refering to
>
> commit 9d92083afb7cabe86c166dce9cc569eabbbd6f99
> Author: Alexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy@...e.de>
> Date: Fri Apr 4 23:43:18 2008 +0400
>
> x86: merge mpparse_{32,64}.c
>
> in linux-next.
>
> About half of the ifdefs seem to be because 32bit does irq compression
> and 64bit does not. Len removed that at some point, but when the files
> are merged I would rather just readd 64bit irq compression (or move
> 64bit over to per cpu vectors) than have this ifdef jungle
the way Alexey did it is the safest way of doing unifications: keep it
simple and finegrained first, keep the more complex steps to later. We
try to stick to that even if there's a temporary jungle of #ifdefs. In a
related discussion (which was unfortunately private too so no URLs) you
suggested to Alexey to redesign the mp-parsing code first, then unify
it. That's the worst possible approach to unification and i advise
everyone against doing it that way. I very much agree with unifying irq
vector management - it's not a simple task at all.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists