[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1207831296.1514.5.camel@localhost>
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 14:41:36 +0200
From: Kasper Sandberg <lkml@...anurb.dk>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Matti Aarnio <matti.aarnio@...iler.org>,
Zhao Forrest <forrest.zhao@...il.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, discuss@...-64.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, yhlu.kernel@...il.com, ak@...e.de
Subject: Re: Does Linux have plan to support memory hole remapping?
On Wed, 2008-04-09 at 19:09 -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Kasper Sandberg wrote:
> > A somewhat related question is.. How come linux does not(as i understand
> > it) support talking to the chipsets to do these things? wouldnt this
> > also give other benefits, such as being able to more precisely control
> > interrupts and stuff?
>
> Sure. Plus, it's virtually guaranteed to crash or corrupt your system
> if you try to do anything which requires ACPI or SMM.
Ah, i just thought that a specific other OS actually did this (which,
now that you mention this, makes a whole lot of sense :-))
>
> -hpa
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists