[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <47FE14B4.4090705@fr.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 15:23:00 +0200
From: Cedric Le Goater <clg@...ibm.com>
To: Kirill Korotaev <dev@...allels.com>
CC: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
"David C. Hansen" <haveblue@...ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Containers <containers@...ts.osdl.org>,
Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...nvz.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] change clone_flags type to u64
Kirill Korotaev wrote:
> The was no real rationale except for some people seeing "clone" functionality
> as the match and the fact that FS_NAMESCAPE was done so made them believe it
> is a good way to go.
> And I warned about flags limitation at the beginning.
yes and now, we've hit the clone wall but that's a good thing.
> Both OpenVZ/vserver suggested to use a special syscall for handling this.
most projects do it that way.
> Maybe it is a good point to switch to it now finally and stop worring about all
> this?
what would be the interface ?
C.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists