[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0804101054010.5673@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 10:55:44 -0400 (EDT)
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Andy Whitcroft <apw@...dowen.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Glauber de Oliveira Costa <gcosta@...hat.com>,
Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...ell.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, pinskia@....gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pop previous section in alternative.c
On Thu, 10 Apr 2008, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> But maybe we can see it in the resulting object file somehow, and do the
> check there (the same way we do the init-section analysis). I assume the
> ..size directive writes some debug info or similar, and we can create a big
> warning when a size is unexpectedly huge and crosses section size
> boundaries?
I'm not sure how much this would help, but where I saw my red flag was
examining the objdump and seeing this:
89: bf 69 00 00 00 mov $0x69,%edi
8e: e8 00 00 00 00 callq 93 <alternatives_smp_module_add+0x30>
8f: R_X86_64_PC32 .rodata+0x8c
A call to .rodata??
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists