lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87fxttn2o2.fsf@basil.nowhere.org>
Date:	Thu, 10 Apr 2008 17:35:25 +0200
From:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To:	lsorense@...lub.uwaterloo.ca (Lennart Sorensen)
Cc:	Jack Harvard <jack.harvard@...glemail.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: gettimeofday() resolution in Linux?

lsorense@...lub.uwaterloo.ca (Lennart Sorensen) writes:
>
> On many systems gettimeofday uses the TSC, but on many multicore systems
> the TSC on each core may be out of sync, in which case the cpu you are
> running on may give a different gettimeofday result than another cpu,
> which is probably a bad thing for some processes.

In this case Linux falls back to other timers which are slower and 
less accurate.

jiffies based gettimeofday is theoretically possible, but near
never used.

-Andi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ