[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080410112736.6c5ee654.pj@sgi.com>
Date:	Thu, 10 Apr 2008 11:27:36 -0500
From:	Paul Jackson <pj@....com>
To:	"Bert Wesarg" <bert.wesarg@...glemail.com>
Cc:	travis@....com, mingo@...e.hu, tglx@...utronix.de, hpa@...or.com,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, gregkh@...e.de,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] x86: add cpus_scnprintf function v3
Bert wrote:
> My statement from above doesn't reflect my opinion. I'm still in
> flavor with the mask output. And from this discussion, I found a new
> point for the mask output: its bounded ;-)
Ok
> I just wanted to note, that these new list attributes would be the
> only way to 'change' the api, ie. introduce a new api and deprecate
> the old one, and not change the format of the present api.
Agreed
-- 
                  I won't rest till it's the best ...
                  Programmer, Linux Scalability
                  Paul Jackson <pj@....com> 1.940.382.4214
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
 
