[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <47FE493C.2010709@zytor.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 10:07:08 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
CC: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Andy Whitcroft <apw@...dowen.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Glauber de Oliveira Costa <gcosta@...hat.com>,
Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...ell.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, pinskia@....gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pop previous section in alternative.c
Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
> Looking at the output below, shows that testing .sections in between
> #APP and #NO_APP would in fact catch this bug.
>
Of course, The Right Thing[TM] would be for gcc to emit .pushsection ...
.popsection around #APP ... #NO_APP.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists