[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <47FE53E2.5070204@zytor.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 10:52:34 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Andy Whitcroft <apw@...dowen.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Glauber de Oliveira Costa <gcosta@...hat.com>,
Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...ell.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, pinskia@....gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pop previous section in alternative.c
Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> Obviously, it would have been really nice if something like the assembler
> had caught it with some simple sanity-test (ie I think the .size thing
> would be a good sanity check _regardless_), so in that sense it's our bug
> that might have been avoided with soem sanity testing, but on the other
> hand, I can well understand that gas didn't do it - since it would matter
> only for totally buggy code that was never emitted by the compiler.
>
Agreed.
> Gas historically used to not do any sanity-checking what-so-ever, and was
> very much meant to be just for compiler output (which is why #APP exists
> in the first place - to mark places that aren't pure compiler input). It's
> actually improved immensely in that area and now is useful as a
> traditional human-usable assembler with lots of support like macros etc.
Indeed it has.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists