[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ed10ee420804101652w467f4d1pc58da3736d7f54c7@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 16:52:49 -0700
From: "SL Baur" <steve@...acs.org>
To: "Benny Halevy" <bhalevy@...asas.com>
Cc: "Andy Whitcroft" <apw@...dowen.org>,
"Jan Engelhardt" <jengelh@...putergmbh.de>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Randy Dunlap" <rdunlap@...otime.net>,
"Richard Knutsson" <ricknu-0@...dent.ltu.se>,
"Stefan Richter" <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>
Subject: Re: [patch] checkpatch: relax spacing and line length
On 4/9/08, Benny Halevy <bhalevy@...asas.com> wrote:
> In http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/26/533,
> SL Baur <steve <at> xemacs.org> said:
> > The proposed two space change is ugly. Can someone NAK it?
>
> I'm not sure what "two space change" proposal this Steve referred to
> and his rejection is based on not-to-sound aesthetic grounds.
>
> The motivation behind our proposal is more than just aesthetic.
> I believe that using tabs for indent and then spaces for alignment
> is functionally better, works for everybody, and will eventually result
> in a more readable code over time, hopefully leading to fewer bugs.
Tabs + a variable number spaces to match up logically with the
previous line is O.K. Tabs + exactly two spaces is what I objected
to. I only posted due to being the originator of the Linux Kernel Emacs
cc-mode style and cc-mode works like the former.
For whatever it's worth, my sentiments are on the David Miller side,
having been the lucky recipient of format changes only patch bombs
before. I suppose you should be glad you don't have someone running
a spell checker on the entire source code.
-sb
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists