linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] pop previous section in alternative.c

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 10 Apr 2008 10:47:18 +0200
From:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, akpm@...l.org,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
	Glauber de Oliveira Costa <gcosta@...hat.com>,
	Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...ell.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, pinskia@....gnu.org,
	apw@...dowen.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pop previous section in alternative.c

"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com> writes:
>>>
>> Oh, and this would not be complete without giving Andrew Pinski
>> complete
>> credit for telling me it wasn't a gcc bug but a bug in the toplevel asm
>> code in the kernel. ;-)

We've actually had such bugs before, it isn't the first time.

>
> In many ways it's kind of silly for this even to be in assembly, since
> all it is is a sequence of comma-separated byte values; I guess it was
> the easiest way to deal with it given the ".byte" prefix, but still...

The nops are primarily used in inline assembler statements (in alternative)
and only once in this table. Not using this would have meant to write
them all twice which would have been nasty. There is also no sane 
way to get standard arrays into inline assembler as instructions.

BTW it looks like the problem was added with 121d7bf5a246d282ba91234d03a4edf9ccc9c940,
signed off by me, sorry for not catching it in review.

Perhaps that is something that would make sense adding to checkpatch.pl?
Complain for .section in inline assembler without .previous or popsection
(cc Andy). I think such a check would make sense. 

-Andi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/