[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080411161702.460410000@bull.net>
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 18:17:02 +0200
From: Nadia.Derbey@...l.net
To: efault@....de
Cc: manfred@...orfullife.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
peterz@...radead.org, xemul@...nvz.org
Subject: [PATCH 00/13] Re: Scalability requirements for sysv ipc
Here is finally the ipc ridr-based implementation I was talking about last
week (see http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/4/4/208).
I couldn't avoid much of the code duplication, but at least made things
incremental.
Does somebody now a test suite that exists for the idr API, that I could
run on this new api?
Mike, can you try to run it on your victim: I had such a hard time building
this patch, that I couldn't re-run the test on my 8-core with this new
version. So the last results I have are for 2.6.25-rc3-mm1.
Also, I think a careful review should be done to avoid introducing yet other
problems :-(
*WARNING*: this patch contains a fix for idr.c
I know, I'm doing things bad, but I only saw the problem this
afternoon.
It should be applied on linux-2.6.25-rc8-mm1, in the following order:
[ PATCH 01/13 ] : copy_idr_code.patch
[ PATCH 02/13 ] : change_ridr_struct.patch
[ PATCH 03/13 ] : ridr_pre_get.patch
[ PATCH 04/13 ] : ridr_alloc_layer.patch
[ PATCH 05/13 ] : ridr_free_layer.patch
[ PATCH 06/13 ] : ridr_sub_alloc.patch
[ PATCH 07/13 ] : ridr_get_empty_slot.patch
[ PATCH 08/13 ] : ridr_get_new.patch
[ PATCH 09/13 ] : ridr_remove.patch
[ PATCH 10/13 ] : ridr_find.patch
[ PATCH 11/13 ] : ridr_integrate.patch
[ PATCH 12/13 ] : ipc_use_ridr.patch
[ PATCH 13/13 ] : remove_ipc_lock_down.patch
Regards,
Nadia
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists