[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <47FEE89A.1010102@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 09:57:06 +0530
From: Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
CC: Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>,
Pavel Emelianov <xemul@...nvz.org>,
Hugh Dickins <hugh@...itas.com>,
Sudhir Kumar <skumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
YAMAMOTO Takashi <yamamoto@...inux.co.jp>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, taka@...inux.co.jp,
linux-mm@...ck.org, David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [-mm] Add an owner to the mm_struct (v9)
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> maybe I don't undestand correctlly...
>
> On Thu, 10 Apr 2008 14:46:02 +0530
> Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> +config MM_OWNER
>> + bool
>> +
> no default is ok here ? what value will this have if not selected ?
> I'm sorry if I misunderstand Kconfig.
>
The way this works is
If I select memory resource controller, CONFIG_MM_OWNER is set to y, else it
does not even show up in the .config
>
>> + /*
>> + * Search through everything else. We should not get
>> + * here often
>> + */
>> + do_each_thread(g, c) {
>> + if (c->mm == mm)
>> + goto assign_new_owner;
>> + } while_each_thread(g, c);
>> +
>
> Again, do_each_thread() is suitable here ?
> for_each_process() ?
>
do_each_thread(), while_each_thread() walks all processes and threads of those
processes in the system. It is a common pattern used in the kernel (see
try_to_freeze_tasks() or oom_kill_task() for example).
> Thanks,
> -Kame
>
--
Warm Regards,
Balbir Singh
Linux Technology Center
IBM, ISTL
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists